My friend, James Anderson (one of Reformed Theol. Seminary-Charlotte’s newest professors in philosophy), just posted a hysterically funny post on his blog about Twitter. He constructs 19 different types of arguments on why one should not tweet. Click here for a good chuckle. Bravo, James!
I’ve been inspired to provide one more argument against Twitter to add to James’ post:
Here’s a Wittgensteinian argument:
1. A word’s use determines its meaning.
2. I do not use Twitter.
3. Therefore, Twitter is meaningless.
Yes, I know, I know, this suffers from the fallacy of equivocation (due to differing senses of *use*). But, in satire, anything goes!